Thursday, 26 July 2007
Sunday, 15 July 2007
why Buddhism?
Why?
One simple explanation, that applies to both Australia and the US, is migration. Both countries attract migrants from Asia who have a traditional belief system. Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Thais, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Lao, Sri Lankans, Nepalis and some Indians come from Buddhist backgrounds. And even though the Pentecostals attract many of their clientele from these migrant groups, the main body of these migrants help boost Buddhist numbers in Australia.
But does this really tell the story of the growth of Buddhism?
I do not think so. My theory is that Buddhism is the only rational religion. Actually, I think what I just said is an oxymoron because religion implies to me irrationality. All religions require a suspension of evidence at some point. All religions are based on faith. Some interpretations of Buddhism do also. Nut from my 30 years of studying Buddhism I have come to the conclusion that the teachings of Buddha are based on a a very simple principle: that we must never cease questioning and never accept anything on face value.
As such, Buddhism is not a religion but a mechanism to develop an understanding of the world around us. So is science. The basic principle of sciences is to develop a hypothesis for a phenomena, use experimentation to measure that phenomena then test the hypothesis. If the experimentation confirms the hypothesis it becomes a theory. But all scientific theory is always open to observation and experimentation.
And this is the reason I think Buddhism is attractive to ever-growing numbers of people. Despite the lipservice paid to religion by political leaders, a better educated community are rejecting the intolerance and limited horizons presented by various religions. Unfortunately, a "us v them" mentality seems to exist between science and religion and while most are persuaded by the rationality of science they are not entirely dissuaded from the emotionalism of faith-based ideas. Buddhism is a safe compromise: as a Buddhist you can retain a scepticism while clinging to some vestiges of irrationality.
Saturday, 14 July 2007
Kensington, in Sydney's Eastern Suburbs
This is a description of my suburb: Kensington and a brief attempt to argue that geography determines culture (this is a major theme in my book, "From the Bodhi Tree").
My home is in Kensington, in the eastern suburbs of
If you were to look at an aerial photo of
With further examination you would note that there is an inland ridge running parallel to the Pacific coastline beaches. At the southern end, this ridge is relatively flat and there are points where loose sand dunes are exposed. As you run your eye northward along the ridge it becomes more pronounced and pressed sandstone replaces sand. By the time your eye reaches the northeastern corner, the ridge has become substantial sandstone cliffs that form the Southern Head of Port Jackson.
The suburbs on the northern extension of this ridge have traditionally been
The land in the beachside suburbs, immediately to the east of the ridge, has been subdivided more vigourous and therefore there is a significantly greater population density, making the housing less attractive for young families and more attractive to people with disposal incomes. These tend to be young professionals or renters. The subculture of the beachside suburbs reflect this social mix and, as with the economy on the ridge, the northern most beachside suburb - Bondi - is the wealthiest, while the southernmost suburb - Malabar - is one of Sydney’s poorest and the location of Sydney’s major gaol and sewerage treatment plant. South of Malabar is La Perouse which deserves a separate description. However, it is important to note here that it has been the dumping ground of
The land of the ridge was amongst the first cleared and settled after European settlement. Two suburbs in particular, Paddington and